Legal Opinion
Frumer v. Cheltenham Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 3, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-3295PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on a motion for a preliminary injunction to have a local municipality’s sign ordinance declared unconstitutional as an invalid restriction on free speech. Ordinance 1536, amending section 25 of the Cheltenham Township, Pennsylvania, Sign Code, 1 23states in pertinent part: “No temporary sign shall be affixed to utility poles, street signs or any other structures within the rights-of-way of public streets or highways within the Township of Cheltenham.” Plaintiffs assert that because they are prohibited from posting…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marshall Frumer, Joyce Caplan, Joan Johnston v. Cheltenham Township, Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Township, Nicholas D. Melair, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Tauber v. Town of LongmeadowDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Geller v. CuomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020