Legal Opinion

In Re Optimal U.S. Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 2, 2011No. 10 Civ. 4095(SAS)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This putative class action arises out of Plaintiffs’ investment in the Optimal Strategic U.S. Equity fund (“Optimal U.S.”), which in turn invested one-hundred percent of its assets with Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff’) and his firm, Bernard L. Ma-doff Investment Securities LLC (“BMIS”). Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) alleges that Defendants — Optimal U.S.’s investment advisor, an employee thereof, and two closely-affiliated Banco Santander entities — failed to conduct adequate diligence regarding Madoff, ignored…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Magi XXI, Inc. v. Stato della Città del VaticanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Prospect Funding Holdings, LLC v. VinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. In Re Optimal U.S. LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. LaRoss Partners, LLC v. Contact 911 Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  5. Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. ReeveDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API