Legal Opinion

Legal Technology Group, Inc. v. Mukerji

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 10, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2017-0631Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) LEGAL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., ) d/b/a ESENTIO TECHNOLOGIES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RAJIV MUKERJI and HBR ) CONSULTING LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Civil Action No. 17-631 (RBW) ) RAJIV MUKERJI, ) UNDER SEAL ) Counter-Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LEGAL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., ) d/b/a ESENTIO TECHNOLOGIES, ) ) Counter-Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Legal Technology Group, Inc., doing business as eSentio Technologies (“eSentio”), filed this civil action against its former employee, Rajiv…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API