Legal Opinion

State v. Hinkle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Grant: Morton D. Clieeord, Judge. Richard Hinkle was convicted of manslaughter and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The defendant, Richard Hinkle, was tried upon an indictment, the charging part of which is as follows : “ On the fifth day of December, 1895, in the county of Grant and State of Oregon, one William Bare did then and there feloniously, and of deliberate and premeditated malice, and in the commission of a robbery, and in the attempt to commit a robbery, kill one George A. Scott, by then and there purposely, and of deliberate and premeditated malice, and feloniously, and in the commission of a robbery, and in the attempt to commit a robbery, shooting and striking him, the said George A. Scott,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. JarvisOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Commonwealth v. SymondsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  4. People v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  5. McGahagin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. FarberOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. Yee GuckOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Pacific Livestock Co. v. GentryOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. State v. AikenOregon Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API