Legal Opinion
Fiorentino v. City of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 2007No. F050578PublishedCited by 8 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAWSON, J.
Appellants contend that the superior court committed reversible error when it dismissed their petition for a writ of mandate to enforce the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1 and subsequently denied them relief from the dismissal under Code of Civil Procedure section 473.
We conclude that the superior court correctly interpreted and applied the dismissal provisions contained in section 21167.4. Dismissal of the CEQA petition occurred because appellants did not file a request for hearing within 90 days of filing their petition, as was required by subdivision (a) of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coburn v. SievertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Houge v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Goddard v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Guardians of Elk Creek Old Growth v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
3Cited by8 opinions
- Central Valley General Hospital v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Friends of Roeding Park v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Salgado v. Carrows Rests., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- TJX Companies, Inc. v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. CarrilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.