Legal Opinion

Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Owens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1904No. 13,598PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Wyandotte court of common pleas; William G. Holt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J. :

This was an action to recover on a fire-insurance policy in which judgment was rendered for plaintiff. The defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was overruled, and the court, at the close of the evidence, refused to instruct the jury to find for the defendant. These are the first two errors alleged. They involve but one question, which is whether the failure of plaintiff to make proof of loss within sixty days after the fire forfeited his policy. It is contended that by the condition of the policy the failure on the part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mason v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Phenix Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FARMERS'CO-OP. UNIONCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Colorado Leasing, Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Wilson v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Dixon v. State Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Bramman v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API