Legal Opinion

Phenix Insurance v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Atchison District Court. Action to recover upon a policy of insurance. Judgment for plaintiff Sullivan, on September 9, 1886. The Company brings the case here. The material facts are set forth in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

Daniel Sullivan commenced his action on June 1, 1883, in the district court of Atchison county, to recover from the Phenix Insurance Company of Brooklyn six hundred dollars, with interest from April 1, 1883, upon a policy of insurance issued to him on December 23, 1881, expiring three years from date, and insuring him against loss by fire in the sum of four hundred and fifty dollars upon his frame dwelling-house, and one hundred and fifty dollars upon his household furniture and effects. On March 22, 1883, the property insured was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Lycoming Insurance v. BarringerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. OwensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Beavers v. Security Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Holyfield v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API