Legal Opinion
Gaborik v. Rosema
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 28, 1984No. K 83-406PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a former Van Burén County Deputy Sheriff, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.G. § 1983, alleging that Defendants deprived him of his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that his rights to freedom of speech, freedom of political expression, freedom of political association, freedom of personal association, and “other rights” have been violated by Defendants in retaliation for Plaintiff having supported Defendant Rosema’s opponent (the incumbent) as a candidate for election as Van Burén County…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Timberlake by Timberlake v. BentonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1992
- Pierre v. SchlemmerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996