Legal Opinion

Lively v. Elkhorn Coal Co.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided January 11, 1952No. 283PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the motion of the defendant for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Fed.Rules Civ. Proc. rule 50(b), 28 U.-S.C.A.

The plaintiff sued the defendant Elkhorn for damages growing out of the following facts:

Elkhorn was engaged in producing coal. Lively was an employee with the designation, Assistant Manager. Elkhorn owned certain coal lands which it desired to develop. Lively entered into an arrangement with Elkhorn whereby he was to go upon the leasehold, remove the overburden, strip miné the coal, build necessary roads, approaches and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wilson v. YoustWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Huff v. McCauleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. Beckett-Iseman Oil Co. v. BackerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Boone v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. MillsKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lively v. Elkhorn Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Owen v. DaysonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  4. Drury v. WaltersDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API