Legal Opinion
Werner v. Hofmann (In Re Hofmann)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota
Decided September 4, 1992No. 19-30194PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM A. HILL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The instant adversary proceeding arises out of a complaint filed on March 16, 1992, by Harlan and Mary Werner (Werners) claiming that the Debtors, Willis and Bonnie Hofmann (Hofmanns) embezzled or converted livestock entrusted to their care. Recovery is premised upon sections 523(a)(4) and (a)(6). Previously, the Wer-ners sued the Hofmanns in North Dakota State Court on the basis of fraud, conversion and breach of contract. That case focused on the temporary placement by the Werners of a number of their dairy cattle with the Hofmanns…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re Jesse H. Long, Debtor. Barclays American/business Credit, Inc. v. Jesse H. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In Re Richard F. Belfry, Debtor. Richard F. Belfry v. Christopher G. CardozoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,476 Harlan Werner Mary Werner v. Willis D. Hofmann Bonnie L. HofmannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Jafarpour v. Shahrokhi (In Re Shahrokhi)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- KMK Factoring, L.L.C. v. McKnew (In Re McKnew)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Johnson v. Davis (In Re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Urological Group, Ltd. v. Petersen (In Re Petersen)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.