Legal Opinion

Costa v. Pratt

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Plaintiff brings this action individually and on behalf of the other distributees of Philip Costa, deceased, and as administrator of his estate for the impressment of a trust on certain real property and to recover the rents and profits thereof.

Defendant has moved for an order directing that all the distributees of Philip Costa be made parties, that the plaintiff, as administrator, be dropped as an improper party and that the complaint be dismissed upon the ground that the agreement on which the action is founded is unenforeible under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds.

That part of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Latham v. Father DivineNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Society Milion Athena, Inc. v. National Bank of GreeceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. McKenzie v. L'AmoureuxNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Fraw Realty Co. v. NatansonNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Booth v. BattistaNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Costa v. PrattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API