Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, Miller

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 15, 2005No. 04-3138 to 04-3140Published

1Concurring in the judgmentTatel, Circuit Judge

This case involves a clash between two truth-seeking institutions: the grand jury and the press. On the one hand, the grand jury, a body “deeply rooted in Anglo-American history” and guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, see United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 342-43, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974), holds “broad powers” to collect evidence through judicially enforceable subpoenas. See United States v. Sells Eng’g, Inc., 463 U.S. 418, 423-24, 103 S.Ct. 3133, 77 L.Ed.2d 743 (1983). “Without thorough and effective investigation, the grand jury would be unable either to ferret out crimes…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API