Legal Opinion
In Re May
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided August 22, 2003No. 566A02PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Justice.
The dispositive issue presented for review is whether the evidence presented at the hearing was sufficient to establish that an altercation in which the juvenile participated occurred in a location that satisfies the requisite “public place” element of the common-law criminal offense of affray. We conclude that the evidence fails to establish that the juvenile’s conduct occurred in a qualifying “public place,” and, as a consequence, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
The facts and circumstances of this case are undisputed. On 1 August 2001, in response to the report…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. HuntlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
- D.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Matter of DrakefordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. Fritz.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GomolaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Commonwealth v. NeeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Dashiell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Oliphant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- In re A.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.