Legal Opinion

Nilsen v. DAVIDSON INDUSTRIES, INC.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1961PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This suit involves the construction and constitutionality of a section of the Electrical Safety Law of this state, ORS 479.510 to 479.850.

A preamble to the Electrical Safety Law states that its purpose is “to protect the health and safety of the people of Oregon from the danger of electrically caused shocks, fires and explosions and to protect property situated in Oregon from the hazard of electrically caused fires and explosions.” ORS 479.520. To this end, it is declared that the Legislative Assembly intends to provide a procedure:

“(1) For determining where and by whom electrical…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CheekSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. O'DELL v. Town of Gauley BridgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 12 OF WASCO CTY. v. Wasco CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. General Electric Credit Corp. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Edwards v. State, Military DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API