Conant v. Kantrovitz
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant presented a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint in the Boston Municipal Court alleging in support three grounds: (1) insufficiency of service of process, Dist.Mun. Cts.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) (1975); (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, rule 12(b)(6); and (3) pendency of a prior action in a court of the Commonwealth, rule 12(b)(9). A judge allowed the motion without opinion, and a judgment was entered dismissing the action. The Boston Municipal Court Appellate Division affirmed and dismissed the report. We reverse.
The judge was not obligated to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Pupecki v. James Madison Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Jenkins v. JenkinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Keen v. Western New England CollegeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harvard Community Health Plan, Inc. v. ZackMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Davis Investment Corp. v. Thayer Associates, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Carmack v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Clark v. Leasecomm Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2000
- Biolitec, Inc. v. Angiodynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.