Legal Opinion

Conant v. Kantrovitz

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 4, 1990No. 89-P-902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant presented a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint in the Boston Municipal Court alleging in support three grounds: (1) insufficiency of service of process, Dist.Mun. Cts.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) (1975); (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, rule 12(b)(6); and (3) pendency of a prior action in a court of the Commonwealth, rule 12(b)(9). A judge allowed the motion without opinion, and a judgment was entered dismissing the action. The Boston Municipal Court Appellate Division affirmed and dismissed the report. We reverse.

The judge was not obligated to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Pupecki v. James Madison Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Jenkins v. JenkinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Keen v. Western New England CollegeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harvard Community Health Plan, Inc. v. ZackMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Davis Investment Corp. v. Thayer Associates, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Carmack v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  4. Clark v. Leasecomm Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2000
  5. Biolitec, Inc. v. Angiodynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API