Legal Opinion

Dryden v. Hubbard-Pickett

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 18, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01730Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 BRYAN DRYDEN, Case No. 2:20-cv-01730-GMN-NJK 4 Plaintiff SCREENING ORDER 5 v. 6 M. HUBBARD PICKETT, et al., 7 Defendants 8 9 Plaintiff, who is in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), 10 has submitted a civil rights complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and has filed an application 11 to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1, 1-1). The matter of the filing fee will be 12 temporarily deferred. The Court now screens Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint under 28 13 U.S.C. § 1915A. 14 I. SCREENING STANDARD 15 Federal courts must…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API