Legal Opinion
Saksena v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 20, 2013No. AC 33646PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The petitioner, Sharad Saksena, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his *154petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court erred when it concluded that trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance by failing to advise him about the immigration consequences of his guilty pleas.1 We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. The petitioner is a citizen of India. During the time period from June, 2004, to July, 2005, the petitioner was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alcena v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. Gang JinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Thiersaint v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- Thiersaint v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- Thiersaint v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015