Legal Opinion

Cantrell v. Henderson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1986No. 85-247PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Plaintiffs sued in the Tenth Judicial District Court for Fergus County claiming damages for personal injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident. Following plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the defendant Mark Henderson, he was dismissed with prejudice. Cardinal Drilling then moved for summary judgment on the grounds that its employee Mr. Henderson had been dismissed with prejudice. That motion was granted. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm the District Court in part and reverse in part.

The issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in dismissing defendant Mr. Henderson with prejudice?

2. Should…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kuiper v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kussler v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Havre v. Twelfth Judicial District of the State of Montana Ex Rel. County of HillMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Petritz v. Albertsons, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. White v. LobdellMontana Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clark v. NorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Burlington Northern Railroad v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v. AddinkMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Sisk v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Brosamle v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API