Legal Opinion
Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 8, 2009No. Civil Action 3:06-CV-1105PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are three (3) of Defendant Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.’s (“Bridgeport”) motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 110, 112, 113.) On January 14, 2008, Defendant Bridgeport filed four (4) motions for summary judgment, three (3)of which concern the '831 Patent. In these motions, Defendant requested summary judgment as to non-infringement of the '831 Patent and the '050 Patent (Doc. 110), summary judgment as to non-willfulness as to the '831 Patent and the '050 Patent (Doc. 112), and summary judgment regarding damages as to the '831…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011