Legal Opinion

Mellinger v. Conestoga Traction Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1927No. Appeal 92PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Plaintiff appeals from the order of the court below, discharging the rule to strike off judgment of non-suit, entered in an action of trespass. We must, therefore, for the purposes of this appeal, consider the facts as given in evidence by the plaintiff and his witnesses in the light most favorable to him.

Plaintiff was driving his automobile north on Cherry Street, a narrow street or alley, in the City of Lancaster, approaching Walnut Street, into which he purposed turning westward. Defendant maintains a street car track on Walnut Street on which the cars travel westward.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haverly v. MercurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Flounders v. Southern Pennsylvania Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Cathcart v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Dutton v. PyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Kennedy v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phila. Dairy Prod. Co. v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API