Wallace v. Miller

Plaintiff sues the defendants for a trespass, for removing a house from her lot of ground to an adjoining lot belonging to one of the defendants, Miller.

*450The answer of Miller is a general denial.

Defendant Schnatman pleads, that he was employed by the other defendant to remove the house: and that, if plaintiff has sustained any damage, Miller alone is responsible.

It is proved that the plaintiff bought the lot with the house on it. The defendant Miller’s title to other lots in the same square is also in evidence. He bought the naked lots, and there is not a word of proof tending to justify this…