Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Berryhill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 10, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17–10379–RWZPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Id. at 24. The ALJ explained that he "considered all symptoms and the extent to which these symptoms can reasonably be accepted as consistent with the objective medical evidence and other evidence," and that he "also considered opinion evidence" in accordance with the Social Security regulations. Id. He ultimately concluded that although plaintiff's "medically determinable impairments could reasonably be expected to cause the alleged symptoms ... [his] statements concerning the intensity, persistence and limiting effects of these symptoms are not entirely credible." Id. at 31.
At the fourth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nicasio RODRIGUEZ PAGAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Claire McDonald v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Jose E. ARROYO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Anderson v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Hosseini v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018