Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 2011No. H036719PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALSH, J.*

Defendant was required to register as a sex offender under California law. He did so. Later he changed residences, first within California and later out of state, without registering any of his new addresses. Defendant was charged with violation of his duty to properly register as a sex offender under both federal law (18 U.S.C. § 2250) and state law (Pen. Code, former § 290, subd. (f)(1)(A), now § 290.013).1

In this case, we consider whether, under California double jeopardy principles, defendant’s prosecution in federal court for failing to register as a sex offender after…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  5. People v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. Malone CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API