Legal Opinion
United States v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 23, 1939No. Nos. 4519, 4520-4522, 4529, 4530, 4536, 4540, 4543, 4544, 4550PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
Thirty actions filed by the plaintiffs were heard together on the question of a temporary mandatory injunction. This Court entered a decree ordering the defendants to comply with Marketing Order No. 4, as amended, during the pendency of this suit. United States of America, et al. v. Whiting Milk Co., D.C., 21 F.Supp. 321.
The cases were then referred to a special master with directions to hear the parties and their evidence, and to make and report his findings of fact to the Court. Hearings were held beginning on January 4, 1938, and were recently concluded. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green Valley Creamery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
- Massachusetts Farmers Defense Committee v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
- Cranston v. FreemanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1968
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- United States v. WoodDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939