Legal Opinion

McBroom v. Ethicon Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 31, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02127Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 No. CV-20-02127-PHX-DGC 9 Amanda McBroom, 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Ethicon, Inc.; and Johnsons & Johnson, 13 Defendants. 14 15 This products liability action involves pelvic mesh devices manufactured and sold 16 by Defendants Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson to treat stress urinary incontinence 17 and pelvic organ prolapse. Plaintiff Amanda McBroom received implants of Defendants’ 18 devices and claims they are defective and caused her serious injury. Plaintiff filed suit in 19 2015 as part of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Cooper v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Anne Ruggiero, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albert Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Company and Parke Davis, Docket No. 04-6674-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API