Legal Opinion

Keller v. Riverton Consolidated Water Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1907No. Appeal, No. 9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 9, March T., 1907, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Cumberland Co., March T., 1905, No. 1, dismissing bill in equity in case of M. R. Church Keller v. Riverton Consolidated Water Company. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Sadler, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned amongst others was decree of the court dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Head, J.,

Although the assignments of error in this case number a score, they have been so grouped by the learned counsel for the appellant, that the consideration and determination, of four questions will dispose of every material point raised by the assignments.

*304Prior to February, 1905, there existed, in the county of Cumberland, six separate corporations, each created for the purpose of supplying water to the public within the territory covered by their respective charters. Each of these companies had been regularly and lawfully created under the general act of 1874 and its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guckert v. HackeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Rumsey v. New York & Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Carpenter v. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney-General v. Atlantic & Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  5. Independent Natural Gas Co. v. Butler Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gring v. Sinking Spring Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Taylor v. Erie City Passenger Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API