Legal Opinion

Read Drug & Chemical Co. v. Nattans

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court, of Baltimore City. (Dawkins, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

Upon a former appeal, this case was presented on demurrer to the bill of complaint (129 Md. 67). It is now to be considered upon the proof. The Record is voluminous, and a detailed review of the testimony would not be practicable within the proper limits of an opinion. The essential facts will be stated in accordance with what the Court regards as the preponderance of the admissible evidence.

The law of the case was settled upon the prior appeal, and we have now only to determine, as a question of fact, whether a definite and mutual agreement has been' proven for the renewal of the existing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carmine v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Carroll v. Manganese Steel Safe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Read Drug & Chemical Co. v. NattansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  4. Eareckson v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. L. C. Smith & Bros. v. Riddlemoser Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duplex Envelope Co. v. Baltimore Post Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Thompson v. Thomas & Thompson Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  4. Smoot v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  5. Oregon Ridge Dinner Theatre, Inc. v. HamlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API