Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Thomas & Thompson Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 3, 1918PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Dubby, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

The questions of law involved in this appeal are not difficult, and have been settled as far as this State is concerned by the cases of Falck v. Barlow, 110 Md. 159; King v. Kai ser, 126 Md. 213, and Read v. Nattans, 129 Md. 67 and 130 Md. 470.

The bill of complaint is one for specific performance. It will suffice to refer very briefly to certain prominent facts’ appearing from the exhibits and evidence, to make entirely plain the proper application of the legal principles as set out in the cases already mentioned.

Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1 purports to be an agreement to lease certain premises,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pellow v. Arctic Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. King v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Calvert v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  4. Falck v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  5. Read Drug & Chemical Co. v. NattansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. LevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  2. Saul v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Darling Shops Delaware Corp. v. Baltimore Center Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Kikas v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. Hyatt v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API