Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Eastvold v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1954No. 32922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

The question presented is whether or not the trial court, in a condemnation proceeding brought by the state of Washington to acquire property for highway purposes, has authority to grant a new trial, after a verdict by a jury determining the compensation to be paid, and before entry of judgment on that verdict.

An order adjudicating public use of the land in question was regularly entered, and a jury trial was had to determine the amount of compensation to be paid to owners of the property. A verdict was returned, but, before the entry of judgment on that verdict, the owners moved for a new…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grays Harbor Boom Co. v. LownsdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Barker v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State v. PrindleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. SUP'R CT. FOR SNOHOMISH CTY.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API