Legal Opinion
In re McCray
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 5, 2013No. 03 Civ. 9685 (DAB)(RLE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*751OPINION AND ORDER
RONALD L. ELLIS, United States Magistrate Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is a Motion to Quash a Subpoena to Produce Certain Video and Audio Tapes brought by non-party Florentine Films (“Florentine”). (Doc No. 187.) Defendants’ amended subpoena, dated October 2, 2012, seeks the production of copies of audio and/or video materials documenting interviews with eighteen specifically named persons collected in the course of reporting and producing a documentary film entitled The Central Park Five (the “Film”). Defendants’ subpoena requests the production of all outtake…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- von Bulow v. von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Charles Baker v. F & F InvestmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard KuhnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- O'Neill v. Oakgrove Construction, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re McCray, Richardson, Santana, Wise, & Salaam LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Jeanty v. City of UticaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- NYC Medical Practice, P.C. v. ShokrianDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020