Giorgianni v. DiSanzo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Ohidsey :
In this action in trespass there was a jury verdict for the defendant. Following denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, judgment was entered on the verdict, and plaintiff has appealed therefrom, assigning error in the court’s charge to the jury.
The plaintiff, Miss Giorgianni, a Miss Garbin and a Miss Zajackowski, young women residing in and employed in the City of Pittsburgh, arranged with the defendant, Miss DiSanzo,1 who resided in the Borough of Freedom, Beaver County, to spend the week-end together. . The first three mentioned members of the party…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Finnerty v. DarbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Stewart v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Tindall v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Jeter v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.