Legal Opinion
Donald Stahl v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 6, 2012No. 10-3761PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
Donald Stahl was arrested under the authority of St. Louis Ordinance § 17.16.270, which prohibits conduct, including speech, that has the consequence of impeding pedestrians or vehicular traffic. After the City dropped the charges against him, Stahl brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as a facial challenge to the St. Louis ordinance. The district court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, finding the ordinance to be a content-neutral time, place, and manner restriction. We reverse and hold that the ordinance is unconstitutional on its face because it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jason Powell v. Larry NobleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Jason Powell v. Roxann RyanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Ronald Duhe v. Little Rock Arkansas, City ofCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Doe v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
- Galbreath v. The City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.