Legal Opinion

Pierce v. North Dallas Honey Company

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 3, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00410Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MARILYN PIERCE, on Behalf § of Herself and All Others § Similarly Situated, § § Plaintiffs, § § v. § Civil Action No. 3:19-CV-00410-X § NORTH DALLAS HONEY § COMPANY, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER North Dallas Honey Company allegedly markets its premium honey as “100% Pure Raw and Unfiltered Honey.”1 Plaintiffs Marilyn Pierce and Anish Dave claim the honey contains syrup (and thus is not 100% honey) and is heated to a level that destroys enzymes that make honey raw. Their complaint contains class…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Dorsey v. Portfolio Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. Benchmark Electronics, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API