Legal Opinion

Williams v. Handschiegl

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 15, 1931No. 2664PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner •of interferences awarding priority of invention to the senior party, Max Handschiegl.

The invention relates to a method of producing composite pictures, and is fully described in the single count in issue. The count reads: “The herein described photographic method of producing composite pictures, which consists in photographing upon, two strips of sensitized film a component object against a black…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Tansel v. HigonnetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. Fernand Georges Bac v. Alfred L. Loomis, Andrew Alford v. Alfred L. Loomis, (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Jean N. Nicolaou v. Michael CoopermanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. Otto Henning v. Scott F. HuntCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API