Legal Opinion

Cross Oil Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Regan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 5, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-1825Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CROSS OIL REFINING & MARKETING, INC., Civil Action No. 21-1825 (JMC) Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL S. REGAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Cross Oil and Defendant Michael S. Regan, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have cross-moved for summary judgment. ECF 11; ECF 13. The Parties agree that the Administrator’s failure to decide Cross Oil’s petition for a hardship exemption from Congress’s renewable-fuel program within ninety days of receipt of the petition violates 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o)(9)(B). And the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. Kevin Hairston v. Davita Vance-CooksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. Trudel v. SunTrust BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API