Legal Opinion
Sanderson v. New Mexico State Racing Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1969No. 8610PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
The petitioner is an owner and trainer of a race horse named Countess Eureka which won a race held at the New Mexico State Fair. A urine sample was taken as provided by the Rules of Racing and an analysis of this sample revealed an extremely low concentration of a drug in nature of procaine. A report of this analysis to the State Racing Commission stated that the low concentration indicated that the drug had not been used as a “blocking agent or a cambiotic” within forty-eight hours of the race and that it was possible that the drug derived from the use of a topical…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Chiordi v. JerniganNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Yarbrough v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Keystone Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc. v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Ross v. State Racing CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mills v. New Mexico State Board of Psychologist ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Seely v. Oklahoma Horse Racing CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- O'Daniel v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State Racing Commission v. McManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- DIV. OF PARI-MUTUEL ETC. v. CapleSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.