Legal Opinion

Treadaway v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 29, 1930No. 6 Div. 646PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The prayer of the bill was to restrain the • respondent, her agent or employees, from en tering upon complainant’s lands, erecting a barbed- wire fence thereon, and interfering with his use and occupation thereof, and to remove cloud from his title by reason of respondent’s claims, and to establish the bounddary line between the parties.

The complainant was in possession and could not bring ejectment. Acker v. Green, 216 Ala. 445, 113 So. 411. And equity has jurisdiction to determine disputed boundary lines. Yauger v. Taylor, 218 Ala. 235, 118 So. 271; Smith v. Cook, 220 Ala. 338, 124 So. 898.

T…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Kidd v. BorumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lay v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. McNeil v. HaddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Sylvest v. StowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Mardis v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API