Legal Opinion

Emerick v. Regus Management Group, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 5, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01576Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAYLOR EMERICK, an individual, CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-1576-GPC-LL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 REGUS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 15 [ECF No. 42] through 25, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is Defendant Regus Management Group, LLC’s (“Defendant” or 19 “Regus”), Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 42. Plaintiff Taylor Emerick, f/k/a 20 Taylor Warfield filed an opposition on November 29, 2019. ECF No. 45. Defendant 21…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API