Legal Opinion

State v. Weekly

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2003No. WD 61086PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.

The Department of Mental Health appeals the unconditional release pursuant to section 552.040 of Scotty J. Weekly. The Department contends that the trial court did not apply the correct standards in its decision. We agree that the trial court misapplied the law. The judgment is reversed.

Statement of Facts

Scotty J. Weekly was a chronic user of intravenous amphetamines. On September 8, 1994, Weekly was in a psychotic state. While under the delusion that his family was in danger, Weekly commandeered a vehicle. Weekly forced an indi vidual, at gunpoint, to drive him…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. RevelsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. NashMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. Revels v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Grass v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. GrattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. In re: Matthew J. King v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API