Legal Opinion

Tavera v. Southland Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2003No. 98-2484-L-3; A112509Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendants’ motion for mistrial and ordering plaintiff, as a condition for continuing the case, to reimburse defendants’ costs and attorney fees. Plaintiff filed her notice of appeal before the court established a specific amount of those costs and attorney fees; the court took no further action after the appeal was filed. We hold that the order is not appealable and therefore dismiss the appeal.

An order granting a mistrial is generally not an appealable order. Heath v. Armore, 208 Or 533, 302 P2d 1017 (1956). Plaintiff argues, however, that the order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heath v. ArmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API