Legal Opinion
Heath v. Armore
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The notice of appeal addressed to the plaintiff and his attorneys says:
“You, and each of you, will please take notice that the defendant in the above entitled action does hereby appeal from the Order of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, for Wasco County, which sustained the motion of the plaintiff to discharge the jury and grant a new trial as follows: * *
At that point the notice of appeal quotes the motion which was made in the circuit court by plaintiff’s counsel “for a mistrial” and the ruling of the trial judge which sustained the motion. The trial judge, in ruling, said: “I will…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ph&338bus v. ConnelleeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Firestone v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Amore v. WilkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Tavera v. Southland Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003