Legal Opinion

Alsip Park District v. D & M Partnership

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 16, 1993No. 1-91-3206PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi

Plaintiff, Alsip Park District (District), brought this condemnation action against defendants, D & M Partnership (D&M) and unknown owners, to acquire land (the site) for which a building permit was previously issued to construct a group home for developmentally disabled persons. The trial court granted defendants a traverse and dismissed the action on their motion, on the basis of its finding that plaintiff abused its discretion when exercising the power of eminent domain because plaintiff had no purpose, ascertainable public need or plan, current or future, for the site. We reverse and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. VaccarroIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of Chicago v. LehmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. City of Waukegan v. StanczakIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Trustees of Schools of Township No. 37 v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. City of Chicago v. Midland Smelting Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Essex Fells v. Kessler Inst.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  4. Department of Transportation Ex Rel. People v. 151 Interstate Road Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. City of Chicago v. Boulevard Bank National Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API