Legal Opinion

Garren v. Rollis

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1962No. 9212PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Appellant’s brief on appeal fails to comply with the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 41 (2) as it contains no specifications of error. The requirement of the rule is not to be lightly disregarded, for specifications of error are in effect the appellant’s pleadings in the appellate court. The specifications of error are necessary for a respondent to determine the questions to be answered, and are necessary for the higher court to single out the specific areas in controversy. 5 C.J.S. Appeal & Error § 1217, p. 34; 3 Am.Jur. 287, Appeal & Error, § 694.

Only by reason that both…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Fogelstrom v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ennis v. CaseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McLean v. City of Spirit LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lohman v. FlynnIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Thiel v. StradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Prather v. LoydIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API