Legal Opinion

Browning v. Hight

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8299PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The appellee sued the appellants for the reasonable value of work and labor done for them at their request, in preparing and dressing seventy-seven thousand white oak staves.”

The answer of the appellants consisted of a general denial, .and a special plea that the plaintiff, did the work under a .special agreement to accept in full compensation therefor the *258shavings and blocks cut from the staves, commonly known as “ offals,” and that the plaintiff received said offals.

The errors insisted upon consist in the giving of instructions, and the exclusion of certain testimony.

In its second…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Comstock v. WhitworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Kennedy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SponierIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API