Legal Opinion

United States v. Quiroz

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1999No. CR 99-55 (RHK/JMM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KYLE, District Judge.

Before the Court are the Objections of Defendants Quiroz and Vasquez to the two Reports and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge John M. Mason. The Objections have been briefed and are now ready for resolution.

This Court has made the required de novo review of the Objections and concluded that Judge Mason properly resolved each of the issues before him. His factual recitation is thorough and his legal analysis sound. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the recommendations of Judge Mason.

Upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Abdi v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  3. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
  4. United States v. PersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API