Shapiro v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Chief Judge.
The judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Appellant, a licensed psychologist, was convicted of sexual misconduct by a psychotherapist under section 491.0112, Florida Statutes.
Appellant was charged under subsection two of the statute, which prohibits sexual misconduct “by means of a therapeutic deception” which is defined to mean “a representation to the client that sexual contact by the psychotherapist is consistent with or part of the treatment of the client.” § 491.0112(4)(b). The record reveals ample evidence from which the jury could find Appellant guilty of making such a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Derouen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Gore v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
- Hobby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Lambert v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Montgomery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.