Legal Opinion

United States v. James E. Bronaugh

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1990No. 89-3510Published

1Opinion of the Court

895 F.2d 247

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

James E. BRONAUGH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-3510.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 14, 1989.

Decided Jan. 23, 1990.

Thomas Bauer, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Akron, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellee.

Gordon S. Friedman (argued), Friedman, Gilbert & Berezin, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellant.

Before WELLFORD and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

1

Under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(a), the crime of making a false statement to procure a firearm is punishable by…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan A. Acosta-CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Louis Edward Henry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. James E. BronaughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. John Hancox FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API