Legal Opinion

United States v. James E. Bronaugh

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1990No. 89-3510PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(a), the crime of making a false statement to procure a firearm is punishable by imprisonment for up to five years. Under the sentencing guidelines, however, if no related offense is involved, the crime is normally punishable by a sentence in the range of four to twenty-seven months, depending on the defendant’s criminal history.

Defendant James E. Bronaugh pleaded guilty to a single charge of procuring a firearm through a false statement. Mr. Bronaugh’s criminal history was such that the sentence range indicated by the guidelines ordinarily…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan A. Acosta-CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Louis Edward Henry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. John Hancox FordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Ira Silverman (90-3205) Morris G. Woodard (90-5816) and Gary Caton (90-5733/91-6506)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. LombardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. SimsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Willie Corbin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API