Legal Opinion · Dissent

Banoski v. Moto-Crane Service, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1971No. Docket 8927Published

1DissentLevin, J.

I would remand for a determination by the trial court of a “reasonable expenditure” for attorney fees for the attorney representing the injured employee and for the attorney representing the subrogee (which could be less, more, or the same as the one-third contingent fee the injured employee agreed to pay his attorney), and for a division of the amount so determined between the two attorneys.

The subrogee is entitled to that portion of the interest paid by the third-party tortfeasor allocable to the subrogee’s share of the recovery.

I

After Alex Banoski, the injured employee, and his wife,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. QuimbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gamble v. American Asbestos Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Modeen v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cree Coach Co. v. Wolverine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API