Banoski v. Moto-Crane Service, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentLevin, J.
I would remand for a determination by the trial court of a “reasonable expenditure” for attorney fees for the attorney representing the injured employee and for the attorney representing the subrogee (which could be less, more, or the same as the one-third contingent fee the injured employee agreed to pay his attorney), and for a division of the amount so determined between the two attorneys.
The subrogee is entitled to that portion of the interest paid by the third-party tortfeasor allocable to the subrogee’s share of the recovery.
I
After Alex Banoski, the injured employee, and his wife,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. QuimbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Gamble v. American Asbestos Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Modeen v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Cree Coach Co. v. Wolverine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.