Legal Opinion

Tan v. Quick Box, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 14, 2024No. 3:20-cv-01082Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEANNE TAN, Individually and On Case No.: 20cv1082-LL-DDL Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 12 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT Plaintiff, 13 KATHRYN MARTORANO’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 JUDGMENT QUICK BOX, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants [ECF No. 338] 16 17 __________________________________ 18 AND RELATED CROSSCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS. 19 20 21 Before the Court is Defendant Kathryn Martorano’s (“Defendant” or “Kathryn”) 22 Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. ECF 23…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. John Louis Lalonde v. County of Riverside, Robert Moquin, and Jason Horton, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Burch v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API